I gave this presentation on Graphene and 2D Electronics at the Marie-Curie Conference 2013 in Florence, on Nov. 25. It was an incredibly nice session with mindblowing presentations especially from renown surgeon Ugo Boggi and CMS emeritus spokesperson Guido Tonelli. As I knew, speaking just after a superstar physicist is really really challenging.
Everybody had to keep their presentations understandable by a general audience of researchers and Marie-Curie fellows from diverse disciplines: hard sciences, social sciences, and humanities. And to stay within 12 minutes. For this reason I think this presentation can be enjoyable by casual visitors of my website. Enjoy.
However, the whole session was humbling. I was really honoured and thankful to the organizing committee for the invitation. Most of all, it was great fun.
Il 20 settembre ho partecipato a una giornata di presentazione delle attività nel campo della Knowledge Acceleration & ICT presso la nostra Università.
Ho parlato per nove minuti nove delle nostre attività sull’elettronica in grafene,
calibrando il discorso per un pubblico non necessariamente esperto dell’argomento.
Ne è uscita una presentazione veloce, semplice e in italiano, su uno dei temi che ci ha tenuto più impegnati, negli ultimi sei anni. E su cui stiamo lavorando molto.
Il video è qua sotto (Bella tendenza i video online di ogni evento, e bella idea quella di seguire la tendenza bene e presto).
Mi è tanto comodo questo video, per dare il puntatore a chi spesso chiede: ma che è sto grafene? che ci fate?
Cliccando sulla playlist si vedono anche le altre presentazioni della giornata.
It is always hard to let people understand distributions in a quantitative way. Often also science-trained people are not good at grasping the nuances of distributions.
This video does the perfect job. It guides you through data and distributions, and calmly prepares you for a shock. Numbers can be used to tell a story.
What also I like a lot is that they provide the data sources, for anybody to check, and that they use a very quiet tone.
No matter whether you agree or not with the underlying thesis, you should appreciate the power of this presentation.
p.s. The only thing that seems a bit sloppy to me is when at some point they swiftly switch subject by talking first of wealth distribution and then of income distribution. The two things are of course really different but this often can induce confusion in viewers (newspapers are also terrible about this).
Lancio mondiale del suo libro “I am Malala”. Evidentemente tutta l’operazione è costruita per trarre il maggior vantaggio possibile dalla candidatura al Nobel per la Pace (era tra i favoriti). Però, se guardate, qui l’intervista al Daily Show, ci sono una passione, una presenza e una proprietà di linguaggio eccezionali. E ha 16 anni. La battuta più bella è quella del lancio della scarpa, al minuto 5. Bella anche quella di Jon Stewart, “il tuo amore per l’educazione mi ricorda quello dei miei figli”. Sentite almeno i primi 6 minuti. Perché valgono.
“There was of course no way of knowing whether you were being watched at any given moment. How often, or on what system, the Thought Police plugged in on any individual wire was guesswork. It was even conceivable that they watched everybody all the time. But at any rate they could plug in your wire whenever they wanted to.”
Last week in Berlin for INC9 I gave a talk on “Graphene transistors and two dimensional electronics”, sharing our views on the future of graphene electronics. The presentation is below.
Most of the activity has been funded from the European Commission in a series of projects. We still have many ideas and many possibilities for student work, graduate and postgraduate work on the topic.
La connessione diretta tra la riduzione del costo del lavoro e riduzione della disoccupazione, c’è solo se si ha in mente di far concorrenza sul costo del lavoro ai nuovi stati membri dell’Unione Europea. Altro che declino.
Confrontati con le altre economie avanzate della EU il nostro costo del lavoro è già basso [Dati Eurostat di Aprile qui]. Specialmente quello dei giovani.
Se vogliamo considerarci un grande paese, dobbiamo pensare che ridurre il cuneo fiscale – che è veramente alto – sia utile per lasciare più soldi ai lavoratori (e quindi farli spendere di più) ma non per far risparmiare le imprese sul costo del lavoro (perché assumano di più).
Il primo utile effetto sarà quindi dare più soldi a chi già lavora, non ridurre la disoccupazione. La riduzione della disoccupazione può essere un effetto importante ma letteralmente secondario, nel senso che se chi lavora spende di più, l’economia può tornare a crescere assorbendo parte degli inoccupati.
Continuare a legare la riduzione del costo del lavoro all’aumento dell’occupazione è una battaglia di retroguardia nel caso migliore, anche se la richiede Confindustria. Beh, però la presunta correlazione tra la riduzione dell’IMU e natalità è un esercizio di retorica impossibile.
His motive was political — obviously. His harm was exactly none — as JSTOR effectively acknowledged. But he deserved, your “career prosecutors” believed, to be deprived of his rights as a citizen (aka, a “felon,” no longer entitled to the political rights he fought to perfect) because of what he did.
Yet here’s the thing to remember on MLK weekend (even though my saying this violates a rule I believe in firmly, a kind of inverse to Godwin’s law, because though I believe these two great souls were motivated by exactly the same kind of justice, King’s cause was greater):
How many felonies was Martin Luther King, Jr., convicted of?
King, whose motives were political too, but who, unlike Aaron, triggered actions which caused real harm (as in physical damage).
What’s that number?
And how many was he even charged with in the whole of his career?
Two bogus charges (perjury and tax evasion) from Alabama, which an all-white jury acquitted him of.
These are basically data following a Post Christmas-party discussion. From the World bank database, GDP growth in the last 20 years in Italy, Germany, France, US, Euro Area. As can be seen, Italy has almost always been the worst performer, the “Maglia nera“.
My argument is simply that it is not a matter of left and right policies, or of left and right political figures. I am choosing a 20-year time span for a reason: In the last 20 years we had for about 10 years a “centre-left” administration, and for 10 years a “centre-right” administration. Can you see the difference in the data? I can’t, since both in good and in bad times we have lost growth opportunities.
For full disclosure, I have voted for the “centre-left” coalition in the last 20 years. Frankly, it was a no-brainer. Anyway, data show that centre-left and centre-right have no clue on how to restore growth in the Country, or in a region, or in a city. And in the few cases in which they have a small clue, they have no courage (this addition is my opinion, not embedded in the data, so it might be wrong).
I just found the name of a sickness I have. I knew I was not the only one, but I now have a confirmation, and I am relieved. Michael Crichton, in a great 2002 speech at the International Leadership Forum, called it “Gell-Mann Amnesia”. It was actually his invention, and name of a Nobel prize only served to confer imore authority to the malaise. To me is therefore Crichton Amnesia.
So, I suffer from Crichton Amnesia. These are the symptoms, in four steps.
I read a newspaper article, or listen to some news on the radio or tv on a topic I know in detail (for example, something related to physics, EE, research, academia).
I realize than the author/speaker has no understanding of what he/she is describing and of what really happened. He/she does not put any effort, and swaps cause and effect.
I decide that journalists are totally unreliable, and that one should never believe what they say.
A few seconds later, I forget my resolution, and I start reading or listening very carefully the next piece, on a topic I have no direct knowledge of, such as Middle East, the financial crisis, China, the prison system, and millions of other things. Indeed, it is amnesia.
I tried to cure myself in 2012, following as little news as possible. Going to the original sources, when the news was really important and time allowed.
But my complete recovery is still far away, and the cure will take a lot of time and effort.
I closely follow Alertme from 2006, since it was founded in Cambridge, UK. I really liked their idea of cloud-based home security and automation with Zigbee sensors before “cloud” was a term en vogue. It resonated with something we were (and still are) trying to do.
Then, they inexplicably (at least for me) switched the primary focus to smart energy, i.e. on ways to use the cloud-based sensor network to monitor and optimize energy use at home. I never understood the move. I made my calculations considering a family living in an apartment, and knowing our family energy consumption. I could not see how one could invest a 500-1000 euros and several hours in the hope to reduce their energy bill of a 50-100 euros per year. I thought the “home security” case was much more compelling. At the time, energy was a favored theme among VC, and I assumed this was a way for them to complete their series B round of 15M GBP.
Now, it seems to me they are refocusing again on cloud-based smart homes, with a minor accent on security. The nice video above details their vision. As distribution is concerned, they switched from direct website selling to partnering with British Gas and Lowe’s. Much larger volumes, smaller margins.
I am really eager to see whether they will still be able to mark their difference with respect to the pack of other home automation companies (no more the Apple of home automation).
Acumen Fund propone da più di 10 anni un modello di organizzazione filantropica organizzata come un fondo di investimento. Non fa donazioni, ma investe capitale paziente in iniziative imprenditoriali che abbiano un ritorno finanziario e sociale. Il ritorno finanziario è importante perché consente che l’iniziativa si autosostenga anche dopo l’intervento filantropico. Acumen reinveste tutto il ritorno finanziario in altre iniziative, moltiplicando l’effetto delle donazioni iniziali.
È il fattore di moltiplicazione che mi piace. Perché quasi sempre la produttività del lavoro e delle risorse nelle iniziative filantropiche è troppo bassa.
Le sedi di Acumen sono quasi solo in Nord America e Asia. In Europa solo Londra e Oslo. Stay tuned…